Topic: Re: F.Jedzrejewski
2 scales
| File | Description | Notes | Period (ยข) | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cxi2 | Second 11/5 <11 17 26 31| permutation epimorphic scale | 11 | 1200.0 | 7 |
| keemun11 | Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning | 11 | 1200.0 |
Thread (2 messages)
From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16) Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski --- In [email protected], "J.Smith" <jsmith9624@...> wrote: > > > Carl, I have no idea who F. Jedrzejewski (sp?) is, or how he explains > his tunings -- which you will find wandering aimlessly and without > supervision, in the Scala tuning files. See fj-11tet.scl. The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think is a good example of that: ! cxi2.scl Second 11/5 <11 17 26 31| permutation epimorphic scale 11 ! 15/14 7/6 6/5 5/4 7/5 3/2 8/5 12/7 7/4 15/8 2
From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16) Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski --- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@...> wrote: > The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation > of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would > make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think > is a good example of that: Here's another good 11-note scale choice, this time not JI: ! keemun11.scl Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning 11 ! 67.924528 135.849057 316.981132 384.905660 566.037736 633.962264 701.886792 883.018868 950.943396 1018.867925 1200.000000