cxi2

From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "J.Smith" <jsmith9624@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Carl, I have no idea who F. Jedrzejewski (sp?) is, or how he explains 
> his tunings -- which you will find wandering aimlessly and without 
> supervision, in the Scala tuning files. See fj-11tet.scl.

The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
is a good example of that:

! cxi2.scl
Second 11/5 <11 17 26 31| permutation epimorphic scale
11
!
15/14
7/6
6/5
5/4
7/5
3/2
8/5
12/7
7/4
15/8
2

From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "J.Smith" <jsmith9624@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Carl, I have no idea who F. Jedrzejewski (sp?) is, or how he explains 
> his tunings -- which you will find wandering aimlessly and without 
> supervision, in the Scala tuning files. See fj-11tet.scl.

The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
is a good example of that:

! cxi2.scl
Second 11/5 <11 17 26 31| permutation epimorphic scale
11
!
15/14
7/6
6/5
5/4
7/5
3/2
8/5
12/7
7/4
15/8
2

From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith"
<genewardsmith@...> wrote:

> The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
> of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
> make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
> is a good example of that:

Here's another good 11-note scale choice, this time not JI:

! keemun11.scl
Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning
11
!
67.924528
135.849057
316.981132
384.905660
566.037736
633.962264
701.886792
883.018868
950.943396
1018.867925
1200.000000