keemun11

Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning

Properties

Notes11
Period1200.0 ¢
JustNo
Source Mailing lists
Referencehttps://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/makemicromusic/topicId_12504.html#12505
Thread2 scales
Tone (¢) Step (¢)
68 68
136 68
317 181
385 68
566 181
634 68
702 68
883 181
951 68
1019 68
1200 181

Similar scales

FileNotesRotationMax diff (¢)
hanson11_tuning_95828_95886 11 8 0.0
xen18-erlich-hanson-11 11 2 0.3
hanson11 11 2 1.1
xen18-erlich-keemun-11 11 2 3.2
star11a 11 2 8.2
supermagic11 11 6 12.5
starling11_tuning-math_19356_19356 11 5 17.6

Parent scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
jioct12 12 4.1
xen12-hanson-06-basic 19 0.0
xen07-chalmers-hanson 19 0.0
xen18-erlich-hanson-19 19 0.3
xen12-hanson-11-chain-87 19 2.1
xen12-hanson-11-chain-72 19 2.5
precata19 19 2.7
madagascar19 19 2.9
xen18-erlich-keemun-19 19 3.2
xen07-chalmers-fokker-k 19 4.0

Child scales

FileNotesMax diff (¢)
hanson7 7 0.0
porchrome2 7 2.7
porchrome3 7 2.7
xen10-chalmers-tritriadic-15-27-25 7 2.7
semimaj1 8 2.7
semimaj2 8 2.7
xen12-chalmers-tritriadic-mt-3-5-15 7 2.7
08_kleismic 8 8.3
prop19_8c 8 9.5
supermagic7 7 14.1
Mailing list post
From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith"
<genewardsmith@...> wrote:

> The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
> of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
> make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
> is a good example of that:

Here's another good 11-note scale choice, this time not JI:

! keemun11.scl
Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning
11
!
67.924528
135.849057
316.981132
384.905660
566.037736
633.962264
701.886792
883.018868
950.943396
1018.867925
1200.000000
Full thread (2 messages)
From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "J.Smith" <jsmith9624@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Carl, I have no idea who F. Jedrzejewski (sp?) is, or how he explains 
> his tunings -- which you will find wandering aimlessly and without 
> supervision, in the Scala tuning files. See fj-11tet.scl.

The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
is a good example of that:

! cxi2.scl
Second 11/5 <11 17 26 31| permutation epimorphic scale
11
!
15/14
7/6
6/5
5/4
7/5
3/2
8/5
12/7
7/4
15/8
2
From: Gene Ward Smith (2006-03-16)
Subject: Re: F.Jedzrejewski

--- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith"
<genewardsmith@...> wrote:

> The Scala header says it comes from continued fraction approximation
> of 11edo, but apparently a math mistake got made. I'd think it would
> make more sense to just use some 11-note JI scale. Here's what I think
> is a good example of that:

Here's another good 11-note scale choice, this time not JI:

! keemun11.scl
Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning
11
!
67.924528
135.849057
316.981132
384.905660
566.037736
633.962264
701.886792
883.018868
950.943396
1018.867925
1200.000000

Raw file

! keemun11.scl
Keemun[11] = Hanson[11] = Kleismic[11] in 53-et tuning
11
!
67.924528
135.849057
316.981132
384.905660
566.037736
633.962264
701.886792
883.018868
950.943396
1018.867925
1200.000000
!
! https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/makemicromusic/topicId_12504.html#12505
!
! [info]
! source = Mailing lists
! file = makemicromusic/messages/yahoo_makemicromusic_messages_api_raw_12292-17046.json
! topic_id = 12504
! msg_id = 12505