Topic: The Two Diadiaschisma Scales
2 scales
| File | Description | Notes | Period (ยข) | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diadiaschis1 | Diadiaschisma scale 2048/2025 67108864/66430125 | 12 | 1200.0 | 5 |
| diadiaschis2 | Diadiaschisma scale 2048/2025 67108864/66430125 | 12 | 1200.0 | 5 |
Thread (3 messages)
From: Gene Ward Smith (2004-01-11) Subject: The Two Diadiaschisma Scales These are based on the diaschisma and the diaschisma-schisma (check Manuel's list if you don't believe me) of 67108864/66430125. Scala tells me the scale closest to diadiaschis1 in my scale archives is bp12_17 "12-tET approximation with minimal order 17 beats". For closest to diadiaschis2 I find that it is, according to Scala, exactly equidistant from duoden12 "Almost equal 12-tone subset of Duodenarium". These scales seem to be warping into some sort of circulating temperament. ! diadiaschis1.scl Diadiaschisma scale 2048/2025 67108864/66430125 12 ! 135/128 18225/16384 1215/1024 512/405 4/3 45/32 3/2 405/256 54675/32768 16/9 256/135 2 ! diadiaschis2.scl Diadiaschisma scale 2048/2025 67108864/66430125 12 ! 135/128 9/8 1215/1024 512/405 4/3 64/45 3/2 405/256 54675/32768 32768/18225 256/135 2
From: Paul Erlich (2004-01-11) Subject: Re: The Two Diadiaschisma Scales --- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > These are based on the diaschisma and the diaschisma-schisma (check > Manuel's list if you don't believe me) of 67108864/66430125. That's diaschisma *minus* schisma. I've been seeing to on all the latest charts. Note its appearance as the "misty" comma here, connecting 12, (51,) 63, 75, and the excellent 87 and 99: http://tonalsoft.com/enc/eqtemp.htm > Scala > tells me the scale closest to diadiaschis1 in my scale archives is > bp12_17 "12-tET approximation with minimal order 17 beats". For > closest to diadiaschis2 I find that it is, according to Scala, > exactly equidistant from duoden12 "Almost equal 12-tone subset of > Duodenarium". The duodenarium is a huge Euler genus in the 5-limit lattice, with over 100 notes, I believe.
From: Gene Ward Smith (2004-01-12) Subject: Re: The Two Diadiaschisma Scales --- In [email protected], "Paul Erlich" <perlich@a...> wrote: > I've been seeing to on all the latest charts. Note its appearance as > the "misty" comma here, connecting 12, (51,) 63, 75, and the > excellent 87 and 99: "Misty" is certainly less clumbersome than diaschisma-schisma. I think I'll call these the Diamisty scales.