Topic: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales
5 scales
| File | Description | Notes | Period (ยข) | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eidohole5 | Fifth eikohole ball | 42 | 1200.0 | 11 |
| eikohole1 | First eikohole ball <6 9 13 17 20|-epimorphic | 6 | 1200.0 | 11 |
| eikohole2 | Second eikohole ball | 18 | 1200.0 | 11 |
| eikohole3 | Third eikohole ball = eikosany | 20 | 1200.0 | 11 |
| eikohole6 | Sixth eikohole ball | 54 | 1200.0 | 11 |
Thread (5 messages)
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-03-11) Subject: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales These are the scales you get around the deep hole, using the Euclidean metric with 5,7,9 and 11 equal. It's not clear to me that the eikosany stands out; ball 2 with 18 notes and ball 4 with 24 notes are permutation epimorphic. (Ball 1 is epimorphic in two different ways, which is a fun fact we can find because of Manuel's improvements to Scala, and which is also true of the 1-3-5-7 hexany.) Here are balls one through six in Scala format. ! eikohole1.scl First eikohole ball <6 9 13 17 20|-epimorphic 6 ! 35/33 7/6 14/11 5/3 20/11 2 ! eikohole2.scl Second eikohole ball 18 ! 56/55 21/20 12/11 63/55 6/5 14/11 4/3 7/5 16/11 3/2 84/55 8/5 18/11 56/33 9/5 28/15 21/11 2 ! eikohole3.scl Third eikohole ball = eikosany 20 ! 56/55 21/20 12/11 63/55 7/6 6/5 14/11 72/55 4/3 7/5 16/11 3/2 84/55 8/5 18/11 56/33 9/5 28/15 21/11 2 ! eikohole4 Fourth eikohole ball 24 ! 21/20 77/72 11/10 7/6 6/5 11/9 77/60 4/3 11/8 7/5 77/54 22/15 3/2 14/9 8/5 77/48 33/20 77/45 7/4 9/5 11/6 28/15 77/40 2 ! eidohole5.scl Fifth eikohole ball 42 ! 56/55 21/20 16/15 12/11 11/10 9/8 112/99 63/55 7/6 6/5 27/22 56/45 14/11 72/55 4/3 27/20 224/165 168/121 7/5 63/44 16/11 3/2 84/55 14/9 63/40 8/5 18/11 42/25 56/33 12/7 189/110 96/55 7/4 16/9 98/55 9/5 20/11 28/15 21/11 64/33 108/55 2 ! eikohole6.scl Sixth eikohole ball 54 ! 56/55 126/121 21/20 16/15 12/11 11/10 28/25 9/8 112/99 8/7 63/55 7/6 196/165 6/5 40/33 27/22 56/45 63/50 14/11 9/7 72/55 4/3 147/110 27/20 224/165 15/11 168/121 7/5 63/44 16/11 22/15 3/2 84/55 14/9 63/40 8/5 18/11 33/20 42/25 56/33 12/7 189/110 96/55 7/4 16/9 98/55 9/5 20/11 224/121 28/15 21/11 64/33 108/55 2
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-03-11) Subject: Re: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales --- In [email protected], "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote: > > These are the scales you get around the deep hole, using the Euclidean > metric with 5,7,9 and 11 equal. It's not clear to me that the eikosany > stands out; ball 2 with 18 notes and ball 4 with 24 notes are > permutation epimorphic. However, at ball 4 a 385/384 interval appears in the scale; before that the intervals seem more reasonable.
From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz (2005-03-14) Subject: RE: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales -----Original Message----- ________________________________________________________________________ Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:54:18 -0000 From: "Gene Ward Smith" <[email protected]> Subject: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales [Gene] These are the scales you get around the deep hole, using the Euclidean metric with 5,7,9 and 11 equal. ... [Yahya] This is _very_ interesting indeed. It will be fun to see how each of these scales works as a compositional resource. In line with my earlier comments, how sensitive are the resulting scales to the choice of metric? For example, what shells and scales arise from using the following metrics? - 1. The "city-block" metric d = Sigma_i (|a_i| ? 2. The hyper-Euclidean metric d = (Sigma_i a_i^n)^(1/n), where n is an integer >2 ? 3. The LCM metric d = LCM_i (a_i) ? 4. Your favourite metric here _________? Notational note: a_i means "a subscript i". In all other cases, the suffix _i means "over all i". ________________________________________________________________________ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 11/3/05
From: Gene Ward Smith (2005-03-14) Subject: Re: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales --- In [email protected], "Yahya Abdal-Aziz" <yahya@m...> wrote: > This is _very_ interesting indeed. It will be fun to see how each of > these scales works as a compositional resource. In line with my earlier > comments, how sensitive are the resulting scales to the choice of > metric? For example, what shells and scales arise from using the > following metrics? - > 1. The "city-block" metric d = Sigma_i (|a_i| ? > 2. The hyper-Euclidean metric d = (Sigma_i a_i^n)^(1/n), > where n is an integer >2 ? > 3. The LCM metric d = LCM_i (a_i) ? > 4. Your favourite metric here _________? How sensitive they are depends in part on how big the ball is. A useful non-Euclidean for the 7-limit is the Hahn norm, described here: http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/hahn.htm Scales which are of Hahn ball type are discussed here: http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/crystal.htm
From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz (2005-03-15) Subject: Re: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales Gene, Thanks for all the pointers! I've just downloaded most of your Theory section as well to read later. Regards, Yahya -----Original Message----- ________________________________________________________________________ Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:15:56 -0000 From: "Gene Ward Smith" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Ball scales (was RE: Digest Number 3438-the diamond) --- In [email protected], "Yahya Abdal-Aziz" <yahya@m...> wrote: > However, I feel that it may be more "natural" for > 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 each to be further from 1 than its > predecessor odd number. In some connections that might be best; for instance, we could make 3 of length log 3, 5 of length log 5 and so forth. One context in which that is useful is discussed here: http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/top.htm However, at other times we want to maximize symmetry, and in this case, we want to see if the eikosany, a symmetrical 11-limit scale, can be seen as a scale of ball type, and the above metric would not help us there. ________________________________________________________________________ Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:20:32 -0000 From: "Gene Ward Smith" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Eikosany ball series deep hole scales --- In [email protected], "Yahya Abdal-Aziz" <yahya@m...> wrote: > This is _very_ interesting indeed. It will be fun to see how each of > these scales works as a compositional resource. In line with my earlier > comments, how sensitive are the resulting scales to the choice of > metric? For example, what shells and scales arise from using the > following metrics? - > 1. The "city-block" metric d = Sigma_i (|a_i| ? > 2. The hyper-Euclidean metric d = (Sigma_i a_i^n)^(1/n), > where n is an integer >2 ? > 3. The LCM metric d = LCM_i (a_i) ? > 4. Your favourite metric here _________? How sensitive they are depends in part on how big the ball is. A useful non-Euclidean for the 7-limit is the Hahn norm, described here: http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/hahn.htm Scales which are of Hahn ball type are discussed here: http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/crystal.htm ________________________________________________________________________ -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.2 - Release Date: 11/3/05