monzo_sumerian_12edo_2place
Monzo - most accurate 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
Properties
| Tone |
Tone (¢) |
Step |
Step (¢) |
| 1800/1699 |
100 |
1800/1699 |
100 |
| 1200/1069 |
200 |
3398/3207 |
100 |
| 1200/1009 |
300 |
1069/1009 |
100 |
| 3600/2857 |
400 |
3027/2857 |
100 |
| 1200/899 |
500 |
2857/2697 |
100 |
| 1800/1273 |
600 |
2697/2546 |
100 |
| 400/267 |
700 |
2546/2403 |
100 |
| 100/63 |
800 |
89/84 |
100 |
| 3600/2141 |
900 |
2268/2141 |
100 |
| 3600/2021 |
1000 |
2141/2021 |
100 |
| 100/53 |
1099 |
2021/1908 |
100 |
| 2/1 |
1200 |
53/50 |
101 |
Similar scales
Parent scales
Child scales
Mailing list post
From: monz (2003-07-06)
Subject: updated Sumerian 12edo page
i'm guessing that back when i posted my webpages
speculating how the Sumerians might have been
able to approximate 12edo over 5000 years ago,
most people's eyes probably glazed over
uncomprehendingly, thanks to all the base-60 math.
well, i've just gone back in and added a bunch of
nifty graphs that show vividly what i'm explaining,
and i've also included the modern-style fractions
for the actual values which measure the string-lengths.
before, i only had the "theoretically correct" fractions,
but this is not exactly what you get when you round
the results of the calculations to 2 sexagesimal places.
now the diagrams include that.
"Simplified sexagesimal approximation to 12edo"
http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/sumerian/simplified-sumeriantuning.htm
also, since i have the fractions now, i've made
a Scala file for each version of the tuning:
!----------- Scala file -----------
! monzo_sumerian_12edo_simp.scl
!
Monzo - simplified 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
12
!
300/283
120/107
120/101
150/119
4/3
75/53
3/2
100/63
180/107
180/101
100/53
2/1
!----------- Scala file -----------
! monzo_sumerian_12edo_2place.scl
!
Monzo - most accurate 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
12
!
1800/1699
1200/1069
1200/1009
3600/2857
1200/899
1800/1273
400/267
100/63
3600/2141
3600/2021
100/53
2/1
-monz
Full thread (1 messages)
From: monz (2003-07-06)
Subject: updated Sumerian 12edo page
i'm guessing that back when i posted my webpages
speculating how the Sumerians might have been
able to approximate 12edo over 5000 years ago,
most people's eyes probably glazed over
uncomprehendingly, thanks to all the base-60 math.
well, i've just gone back in and added a bunch of
nifty graphs that show vividly what i'm explaining,
and i've also included the modern-style fractions
for the actual values which measure the string-lengths.
before, i only had the "theoretically correct" fractions,
but this is not exactly what you get when you round
the results of the calculations to 2 sexagesimal places.
now the diagrams include that.
"Simplified sexagesimal approximation to 12edo"
http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/sumerian/simplified-sumeriantuning.htm
also, since i have the fractions now, i've made
a Scala file for each version of the tuning:
!----------- Scala file -----------
! monzo_sumerian_12edo_simp.scl
!
Monzo - simplified 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
12
!
300/283
120/107
120/101
150/119
4/3
75/53
3/2
100/63
180/107
180/101
100/53
2/1
!----------- Scala file -----------
! monzo_sumerian_12edo_2place.scl
!
Monzo - most accurate 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
12
!
1800/1699
1200/1069
1200/1009
3600/2857
1200/899
1800/1273
400/267
100/63
3600/2141
3600/2021
100/53
2/1
-monz
Raw file
! monzo_sumerian_12edo_2place.scl
!
Monzo - most accurate 2-place sexagesimal 12edo approximation
12
!
1800/1699
1200/1069
1200/1009
3600/2857
1200/899
1800/1273
400/267
100/63
3600/2141
3600/2021
100/53
2/1
!
! https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_45318.html#45318
!
! [info]
! source = Mailing lists
! file = tuning/messages/yahoo_tuning_messages_api_raw_40000-49986.json
! topic_id = 45318
! msg_id = 45318